SKIP TO CONTENT
Liquid StakingUpdated Feb 13, 2026

swETH vs rETH

Compare Swell swETH vs Rocket Pool rETH. Analyze restaking features vs decentralization, yields, and strategic positioning.

Feature Comparison

FeatureswETHrETH
Base APY
3.4-4.0%
3.3-3.9%Tie
Protocol Fee
10%Winner
~14%
Decentralization
Moderate
MaximumWinner
Node Operators
Curated
2000+ permissionlessWinner
Restaking Integration
Native (rswETH)Winner
Via third-party
Points/Incentives
Pearls programWinner
None
Censorship Resistance
Moderate
HighWinner
Track Record
Since 2023
Since 2021Winner
DeFi Integration
Growing
EstablishedWinner
Liquidity
Moderate
GoodWinner

swETH vs rETH: Swell vs Rocket Pool Liquid Staking 2026

Swell's swETH and Rocket Pool's rETH both use value-accruing models but differ significantly in their core value propositions. RETH maximizes decentralization while swETH focuses on restaking integration. This comparison helps you choose based on your priorities.

Core Value Propositions

rETH represents the gold standard for decentralized liquid staking. With 2000+ permissionless node operators, it offers maximum censorship resistance and aligns with Ethereum's decentralization goals. swETH prioritizes restaking innovation and EigenLayer integration. Its native rswETH product provides streamlined access to restaking yields and points.

Yield and Economics

rETH Returns

  • Base APY: 3.3-3.9%
  • Protocol Fee: ~14%
  • Additional Yield: Limited
  • Model: Straightforward value-accruing

swETH Returns

  • Base APY: 3.4-4.0%
  • Protocol Fee: 10%
  • Additional: rswETH restaking + pearls
  • Model: Value-accruing with restaking pathway

swETH offers higher potential returns through restaking, but rETH provides more consistent base yields.

Decentralization Analysis

rETH Decentralization

  • 2000+ independent node operators
  • Permissionless operator entry
  • RPL collateral alignment
  • Geographic distribution
  • True censorship resistance

swETH Decentralization

  • Curated operator set
  • More centralized validation
  • Focus on performance over distribution
  • Growing operator diversity

Restaking Features

rETH Restaking Path

  • Can be restaked via third-party LRTs
  • Requires additional wrapping steps
  • Multiple options (EtherFi, Kelp, Renzo)

swETH Restaking Path

  • rswETH: Native liquid restaking
  • Direct EigenLayer integration
  • Simplified user experience
  • Integrated points accumulation

Who Should Choose Which

Choose rETH If:

  • Decentralization is paramount
  • You want to support Ethereum's health
  • Consistent, predictable returns preferred
  • You value censorship resistance
  • You're holding long-term

Choose swETH If:

  • Restaking is your strategy
  • You want native EigenLayer exposure
  • Points and airdrops interest you
  • You prefer integrated solutions
  • You're building for restaking yields

Conclusion

rETH wins for users prioritizing decentralization and Ethereum alignment. swETH wins for restaking-focused strategies with its native integration.

Both are solid choices with different strengths. Your priority. Decentralization or restaking. Should guide the decision.

Optimize your LST strategy with Fensory.

Risk Analysis

**Decentralization Risk**: rETH's permissionless network is more resilient. SwETH's curated operators introduce concentration. **Smart Contract Risk**: rETH has longer track record. SwETH (and rswETH) are newer systems. **Restaking Risk**: swETH's native restaking adds smart contract layers. RETH's simplicity may be safer. **Protocol Risk**: Smaller protocols (swETH) face higher competitive pressure. **Regulatory Risk**: rETH's decentralization provides better censorship resistance.

Verdict

Winner: rETH for decentralization-focused users and long-term holders. swETH wins for active restaking strategies and EigenLayer positioning. RETH is the safer, more aligned choice; swETH offers higher potential returns with added complexity.

Track yields on swETH and rETH in real-time.

Track live yields, compare protocols, and build your DeFi portfolio with Fensory.

GET EARLY ACCESSArrow right