SKIP TO CONTENT
rwa protocolsUpdated Feb 15, 2024

Ondo Finance vs Mountain Protocol

Comparing USDY vs USDM yield-bearing stablecoins backed by real-world assets.

Feature Comparison

FeatureOndo FinanceMountain Protocol
Product
USDY
USDMTie
Backing
US Treasuries
US T-BillsTie
Yield Mechanism
Rebase or AppreciationWinner
Daily Rebase
DeFi Integration
ExtensiveWinner
Growing
Regulatory Status
US Framework
Bermuda LicensedTie
Chain Availability
MultipleWinner
Expanding

Introduction: The Rise of Yield-Bearing Stablecoins

A new category of stablecoins has emerged that offers what traditional stablecoins like USDC and USDT cannot: native yield. Ondo's USDY and Mountain Protocol's USDM represent the forefront of this innovation, both offering US Treasury-backed yields to holders. But they differ in structure, accessibility, and integration.

This comparison helps you understand which yield-bearing stablecoin fits your needs.

Product Overview

USDY (Ondo Finance)

USDY is Ondo's flagship retail product, designed to provide broad access to tokenized Treasury yields.

Key Characteristics:
  • Backed by short-term US Treasuries and bank deposits
  • Yield accrues through token rebasing or value appreciation
  • Available on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains
  • Targets approximately 5% APY tracking Treasury rates
  • KYC required for minting, but secondary trading permitted

USDY represents Ondo's vision of democratizing access to Treasury yields, making them available to anyone with an internet connection and crypto wallet.

USDM (Mountain Protocol)

USDM takes a similar approach with some key distinctions in structure and positioning.

Key Characteristics:
  • Backed by short-term US Treasury bills
  • Rebasing mechanism distributes yield daily
  • Focus on European and non-US markets initially
  • Similar approximately 5% APY target
  • Regulated under Bermuda framework

Mountain Protocol emphasizes regulatory compliance and has secured licensing that may prove valuable as global regulations evolve.

Yield Mechanics

How USDY Generates Yield

USDY's yield comes from the underlying Treasury securities held by Ondo:

  1. Users deposit USD and receive USDY
  2. Ondo invests deposits in short-term Treasuries
  3. Treasury interest accrues to USDY holders
  4. Yield distributed through token mechanics

Ondo takes a management fee (approximately 0.35%), with remaining yield passed to holders. The yield is transparent and tied directly to prevailing Treasury rates.

How USDM Generates Yield

USDM follows a similar model with daily rebasing:

  1. Deposits backed by T-bills in segregated accounts
  2. Interest from T-bills collected daily
  3. USDM supply increases proportionally
  4. Holders see balance increase automatically

Mountain Protocol also charges management fees, with net yield competitive with USDY. The rebasing mechanism means your USDM balance grows daily rather than the token price appreciating.

Structural Differences

Token Mechanics

USDY Options:
  • Standard USDY: Value appreciation model
  • Rebasing USDY: Balance increases over time
  • Flexibility in how users receive yield
USDM:
  • Pure rebasing model
  • Balance increases daily
  • Simpler but less flexible

Regulatory Framework

USDY:
  • US-based issuer
  • SEC considerations for US persons
  • Working within existing securities framework
USDM:
  • Bermuda-regulated
  • Potentially better access for non-US users
  • Clear regulatory status in certain jurisdictions

DeFi Integration

USDY in DeFi

USDY has achieved strong DeFi integration:

  • Collateral on major lending protocols
  • Liquidity pools on DEXs
  • Integration with yield aggregators
  • Growing acceptance as payment/settlement

The token's flexibility (rebasing vs. Non-rebasing versions) aids integration, as different protocols prefer different mechanics.

USDM in DeFi

USDM is building its DeFi presence:

  • Initial integrations on Ethereum DeFi
  • Partnerships with lending protocols
  • Cross-chain expansion underway
  • Growing liquidity in secondary markets

While newer than USDY, USDM is actively expanding its DeFi footprint with a focus on sustainable, compliant growth.

Risk Comparison

Shared Risks

Both products share common risks:

  • Interest rate risk: Yields fall if Treasury rates decline
  • Regulatory risk: Securities law uncertainty
  • Centralization risk: Single issuer controls redemptions
  • Smart contract risk: Wrapper vulnerabilities

USDY-Specific Considerations

  • Larger TVL may indicate more robust infrastructure
  • US regulatory scrutiny more intense
  • Broader chain availability spreads technical risk

USDM-Specific Considerations

  • Newer protocol with shorter track record
  • Bermuda regulation may prove advantageous
  • Smaller scale means potentially faster adaptation

Accessibility

Geographic Availability

USDY:
  • Restrictions for US persons on certain products
  • Available in most global jurisdictions
  • Multiple chain deployments increase accessibility
USDM:
  • Initially focused on non-US markets
  • European and Asian focus
  • Growing global availability

Minimum Investments

Both products target accessibility:

  • Low minimums for retail users
  • No lockup periods for standard products
  • Easy on/off ramps through exchanges

Use Case Comparison

When USDY Excels

  1. Maximum DeFi composability: More integrations available
  2. Multi-chain usage: Broader chain support
  3. Yield flexibility: Choose rebasing or appreciation
  4. Established track record: Longer operational history

When USDM Excels

  1. Non-US users: Potentially cleaner regulatory access
  2. Simple yield: Rebasing is straightforward
  3. Regulatory clarity: Bermuda license provides certainty
  4. Growing ecosystem: Early adopter opportunities

The Future of Yield-Bearing Stablecoins

Both USDY and USDM represent the future direction of stablecoins. As TradFi rates remain elevated, the opportunity cost of holding zero-yield stablecoins becomes increasingly apparent.

Market Trends:
  • Growing TVL in yield-bearing stablecoins
  • Increasing DeFi integration
  • Regulatory frameworks evolving
  • Competition driving innovation

Verdict

Choose USDY if you prioritize:
  • Maximum DeFi integration and composability
  • Multi-chain availability
  • Established track record
  • Flexibility in yield mechanics
Choose USDM if you want:
  • Clear regulatory status (Bermuda license)
  • Non-US focused compliance
  • Simple rebasing mechanics
  • Early participation in growing protocol

For most DeFi users, USDY's broader integration makes it more practical today. USDM offers compelling alternatives, especially for users valuing regulatory clarity or located in regions where USDM has better accessibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are these safer than regular stablecoins?

Different risks, not necessarily safer. You gain yield but accept issuer and regulatory risk that pure stablecoins may not have.

Can I earn yield on Aave with these?

USDY is integrated with several lending protocols. Check current integrations as they expand rapidly.

What happens if Treasury rates drop?

Your yield will decrease proportionally. Both products track prevailing Treasury rates.

Is the yield guaranteed?

No. Yields depend on Treasury rates and are not guaranteed by any government entity.

. -

Compare yield-bearing stablecoins and find the best rates with Fensory. Track your RWA positions in one dashboard.

Risk Analysis

Both carry similar risks from Treasury backing structure. USDY has longer track record and more integrations. USDM offers clearer regulatory status through Bermuda licensing. Interest rate and centralization risks apply to both.

Verdict

USDY for maximum DeFi composability and established infrastructure. USDM for regulatory clarity and non-US focused users.

See current APY across both protocols side by side.

Track live yields, compare protocols, and build your DeFi portfolio with Fensory.

GET EARLY ACCESSArrow right