SKIP TO CONTENT
Liquid RestakingUpdated Feb 13, 2026

Kelp DAO vs Renzo

Compare Kelp DAO vs Renzo liquid restaking protocols. Analyze multi-LST vs multi-chain approaches, yields, and ecosystem strategies.

Feature Comparison

FeatureKelp DAORenzo
TVL
$1.5B+
$2B+Winner
Collateral Flexibility
Multiple LSTsWinner
ETH only
Multi-Chain
Limited
NativeWinner
Yield Potential
6-10%+
6-12%+Winner
Underlying Diversity
HighWinner
Low
Simplicity
Complex
SimpleWinner
L2 Presence
Growing
StrongWinner
Existing LST Support
YesWinner
No
Points Program
Kelp Miles
ezPointsTie
Growth Rate
Steady
FastWinner

Kelp vs Renzo: Liquid Restaking Challenger Comparison 2026

Kelp DAO and Renzo are both challenging EtherFi's dominance with different strategies. Kelp focuses on multi-LST flexibility while Renzo emphasizes multi-chain expansion. This comparison helps you choose between these emerging leaders.

Strategic Positioning

Kelp DAO differentiates through its multi-LST model, accepting stETH, ETHx, and sfrxETH as collateral. This provides unique flexibility for existing LST holders. Renzo differentiates through aggressive multi-chain expansion with native ezETH deployments across L2s. This provides ecosystem-wide presence.

Core Differences

Kelp's Multi-LST Approach

  • Accepts multiple liquid staking tokens
  • Flexibility for existing positions
  • Diversified underlying exposure
  • Complex but versatile

Renzo's Multi-Chain Approach

  • Native deployments on L2s
  • Chain-specific optimizations
  • Broader ecosystem reach
  • Aggressive expansion

Yield Comparison

Both offer competitive yields in the 6-12% range, with Renzo often showing higher potential due to aggressive AVS strategies.

rsETH (Kelp) Yields

  • Underlying LST yield varies
  • AVS rewards added
  • Kelp Miles incentives
  • Total: 6-10%+

ezETH (Renzo) Yields

  • Base ETH staking
  • Yield-optimized AVS
  • ezPoints rewards
  • Total: 6-12%+

Use Case Optimization

Choose Kelp When:

  • You have existing LSTs
  • Diversified underlying appeals
  • You don't want to exit positions
  • Flexibility is priority

Choose Renzo When:

  • You're depositing fresh ETH
  • Multi-chain presence matters
  • You want yield optimization
  • L2 native exposure desired

Market Position

Kelp Metrics

  • TVL: $1.5B+
  • Growing adoption
  • Stader affiliation
  • Unique positioning

Renzo Metrics

  • TVL: $2B+
  • Rapid growth
  • Multi-chain presence
  • Strong momentum

Conclusion

Kelp wins for LST holders seeking restaking without liquidating positions. The multi-asset model is unique. Renzo wins for fresh ETH and multi-chain strategies with its aggressive expansion.

Both are solid alternatives to EtherFi with different value propositions.

Track LRT yields on Fensory.

Risk Analysis

**Underlying Risk**: Kelp's multi-LST model compounds LST-specific risks. Renzo has simpler ETH exposure. **Multi-Chain Risk**: Renzo's native deployments add cross-chain complexities. **Smart Contract Risk**: Kelp has more complex contracts; Renzo has more deployments. **Protocol Risk**: Both are relatively new challengers to EtherFi. **Market Risk**: Both must continue growing to remain competitive.

Verdict

Winner: Contextual. Kelp wins for existing LST holders; Renzo wins for fresh ETH and multi-chain. Neither is clearly superior overall. Choice depends on your current holdings and chain preferences.

Find the best opportunities on Kelp DAO and Renzo.

Track live yields, compare protocols, and build your DeFi portfolio with Fensory.

GET EARLY ACCESSArrow right